Monday, April 23, 2012
Planning Commission 4/18
I attended the Planning Commission and here's what I saw.
I think the idea has real merit. I think Rick Greiwe and Columbia Twp have an exciting idea for the tired & unsightly, inefficient & unsafe** area, and they deserve an "at-bat". I am glad the PC recommended advancing to step 2 in the process.
My two concerns, which I believe are very solvable include pedestrian safety and side street indirect impacts. Again, manageable, so I'm excited we're moving fwd.
Cortney
**In my view, "unsafe" is fair because of the shooting there last month, the near misses every day, the confusion and angst caused by so many motorists trying to navigate the 6 way stop.
Council Meeting 4/9
I attended Council on 4/19 and here's what I saw.
Congratulations for Officers Mitchell of Mariemont and Kaiser of Fairfax for being awarded Act of Bravery in response to the homicide (domestic violence) in the Village last year.
Miscellaneous Expenses adding up. I don't question the legitimacy of any one line item, but too much in the "All Other" bucket makes it difficult to understand and observe trends. Thanks to Joanee and Sue for putting up with the additional headache of extra detail.
Trash put into Health & Rec. I don't think this makes a ton of sense, and I would like to know where the Code of Ordinances suggests it belongs here. However, I'm a fan of Denise's and trust her judgement. And, since we both sit on both committees, it doesn't make sense to throw up roadblocks.
I voted in the affirmative on all votes, as all were procedural except: Levy renewal - I think a renewal is reasonable especially ahead of State budget cuts starting next year. Repaving Miami - paid for partially with grants. I think it's reasonable.
Cortney
ICRCTV.COM
Monday, April 9, 2012
Council Meeting 3/12
I attended Council on 3/12 and here's what I saw.
Police Car replacement. I would like to minimize total net cost of our police fleet without sacrificing safety, and if we can do it be selling cars when residual value is still high, I would support it. It will come down to net-net costs for vehicle + repair. Someone like Tony or Andy K could do this side by side analysis.
Murray one way. I don't care for the non-intuitive one way proposal on Murray, however as a test and learn, I am ok to proceed. I think this will need to be revisitied if the Roundabout advances, but again for test & learn, I'm ok.
Opportunistic Square Parking. I have a rough doc that can produce 200 incremental spots within walking distance of the Square. I'm glad we painted Wooster in front of the Admin bldg, but we should go further, ahead of the new restaurant opening. I hope to publish my do to the blog soon. Procedurally, I'm not sure how to will these spaces into reality.
Recycling award. Well done, I'm proud to live in a Village where we are so committed. I would like to explore even larger containers so we can exceed 40%. Chairing Public Works this year gives me a chance to work on this.
Annexation. While I'll happily take opportunistic revenue (taxes), I don't understand the timing of this action. Why now? If it's the right thing to do, why are we acting only now? What is so bad about having Newtown as a neighbor at the Eastern boundary of the current Village footprint (they hope to annex all the way to the library ish). How is this different than us "meeting" Newtown down by Froggy's? What is goodwill with Columbia Twp worth? We share more border than anyone else (I think). They don't want us to do this. Further, police and fire will have to flex in more. Flex = cost, regardless of what the Mayor claims. Who will support these new businesses? I think there are many critical questions that need to answered first.
Roundabout - this idea has been improved to benefit Mariemont more vs 18 mo ago. It is right for many reasons. Intersection is dangerous (as measured by frustration and near misses), it's terribly unsightly, it's backed up during rush hour. My 2 concerns, which can be managed are encouraging pedestrianism and cost.
I voted in the affirmative on all votes since all were procedural in nature except:
Police cruiser - I am supportive of retiring the 8+ year old car
Stop sign ordinance on Joan - I think we're putting in too many, but this is a blind curve and I'm supportive.
Benefits pool - this will save the Village over the long term
Street Repairs - maintaining our roadways is right for the Village
Cortney
ICRCTV.COM
Police Car replacement. I would like to minimize total net cost of our police fleet without sacrificing safety, and if we can do it be selling cars when residual value is still high, I would support it. It will come down to net-net costs for vehicle + repair. Someone like Tony or Andy K could do this side by side analysis.
Murray one way. I don't care for the non-intuitive one way proposal on Murray, however as a test and learn, I am ok to proceed. I think this will need to be revisitied if the Roundabout advances, but again for test & learn, I'm ok.
Opportunistic Square Parking. I have a rough doc that can produce 200 incremental spots within walking distance of the Square. I'm glad we painted Wooster in front of the Admin bldg, but we should go further, ahead of the new restaurant opening. I hope to publish my do to the blog soon. Procedurally, I'm not sure how to will these spaces into reality.
Recycling award. Well done, I'm proud to live in a Village where we are so committed. I would like to explore even larger containers so we can exceed 40%. Chairing Public Works this year gives me a chance to work on this.
Annexation. While I'll happily take opportunistic revenue (taxes), I don't understand the timing of this action. Why now? If it's the right thing to do, why are we acting only now? What is so bad about having Newtown as a neighbor at the Eastern boundary of the current Village footprint (they hope to annex all the way to the library ish). How is this different than us "meeting" Newtown down by Froggy's? What is goodwill with Columbia Twp worth? We share more border than anyone else (I think). They don't want us to do this. Further, police and fire will have to flex in more. Flex = cost, regardless of what the Mayor claims. Who will support these new businesses? I think there are many critical questions that need to answered first.
Roundabout - this idea has been improved to benefit Mariemont more vs 18 mo ago. It is right for many reasons. Intersection is dangerous (as measured by frustration and near misses), it's terribly unsightly, it's backed up during rush hour. My 2 concerns, which can be managed are encouraging pedestrianism and cost.
I voted in the affirmative on all votes since all were procedural in nature except:
Police cruiser - I am supportive of retiring the 8+ year old car
Stop sign ordinance on Joan - I think we're putting in too many, but this is a blind curve and I'm supportive.
Benefits pool - this will save the Village over the long term
Street Repairs - maintaining our roadways is right for the Village
Cortney
ICRCTV.COM
3/26 Council - absent
I missed the 3/26 Council meeting due to family vacation. Reading the minutes, though, here are my thoughts:
-glad Andy took a minute to acknowledge the loss of Collin and especially the Chief
-I support investing in new playground equipment, replacement windows, Maintenance Dept truck, and Queen City Blacktop's state subsidized bid for Miami Rd (which includes sidewalks too I believe)
-glad to see Scott McIntosh is back on the Pool Board
Cortney
ICRCTV.COM
-glad Andy took a minute to acknowledge the loss of Collin and especially the Chief
-I support investing in new playground equipment, replacement windows, Maintenance Dept truck, and Queen City Blacktop's state subsidized bid for Miami Rd (which includes sidewalks too I believe)
-glad to see Scott McIntosh is back on the Pool Board
Cortney
ICRCTV.COM
Monday, April 2, 2012
Public Works Committee Minutes 3/19
Here are the Minutes of our Committee Meeting held on 3/19/2012
Cortney
----------------------------------------
Cortney called the meeting to order 6:00PM 3/19/2012 to discuss 2 topics: bids for Miami Rd resurfacing, and assessment of sidewalk repiar (Albert Pl non standard surfaces, do we assess Residents like in other Municipalities).
Cortney said Chris presented us with 6 bids. Queen City, a reputable Company, was the low bid ($121,840). Cortney thought it was reasonable and low risk. Chris estimated $130K, and bid came in $8200 below Engineer's Estimate. $60K comes in from Ohio Public Works Committee, $20K from Hamilton County Municipal Road fund (Mar 8 letter). Village pays $41,840. Cortney said previous meeting we expected to pay$40K, now $41K. Denise asked if they did work last year. Chris confirmed they did Plainville Rd. Also work in 2010 and before. Denise asked if issues. Chris said no except for a traffic complaint which was resolved in a day. Cortney recommends the Committee accept the bid of Queen City Blacktop. Jeff and Denise were aligned.
Cortney said at the last meeting, we learned that Village position is owner is responsible for sidewalks. If Public trees affect sidewalk, it's not the homeowners responsibility. Conversely, if no public property cause for damage, it's on the homeowner. Jeff said he didn't understand the inconsistency of who's responsible, sometimes homeowner, sometimes Village. Why not more consistent? Denise said our Code is same across many communities. This inconsistency is common. Cortney asked Chris about City of Cincinnati program. Chris said Urban Forestry takes care of their own trees. If trees cause damage, Urban Forestry confirms and then condemns the tree. Cortney said he's concerned about precedent of removal. Cortney asked if the Village should start assessing homeowners. Is effort worth the revenue stream? Cortney said it's an opportunity to clarify or change our position. Denise said if assess, we'll make it prohibitive for homeowners in Hist District. Already an issue with Properties being maintained. Denise suggested pay for all repairs out of same fund, no Assessments. Cortney agreed and said if 100% assessment, it's a big burden on the homeowner. Option is to assess a more reasonable fee. But still we have to manage policing sidewalks. Becomes a logistical difficulty. Jeff said assume we don't go down the assessment path, how will we react to a homeowner complaining about the first small crack. Cortney said we'd expand the road grading system to sidewalks. But do we want the overhead. Jeff asked Chris if we wanted to pursue a more aggressive program, how much would it cost? Chris said $10-$20K for a sidewalk fund. Jeff said he was concerned about overhead. Jeff asked what do we do about the Contractor who smashes the sidewalk during a homeowner project. Cortney asked if the group was supportive of maintaining the current system: Village pays for all sidewalk repair even though the Code doesn't require us to. Jeff and Denise were in alignment.
Albert Place discussion. Cortney asked if the Committee was supportive of a letter to the affected homes on Albert Place. Denise asked if the sidewalks are original. Cortney said 2 experts don't believe they are. Burden is then on the Residents to prove otherwise. Jeff asked if Albert Pl was in the historic district. Cortney said he thought it was, like Sheldon Close and Denny Place. Jeff said we need to be careful of setting precedent of replacing at any cost. This issue is not worth entering the argument at $17,000. Cortney asked what action should the Committee take. Albert Pl is in a holding pattern, no money has been appropriated. Repair is a very interesting option vs replace. Concrete base repair will be deep and will slice many roots that keep the trees healthy. So repair may be a desirable option for the residents. Could the residents repair the sidewalk areas themselves with help/instruction. We need to address the safety concern brought to us. We need to do something, just not sure what that something is. Jeff asked if there is any precedent of replacement. Cortney said Indianview had brick sidewalks. Might have been Petoskey or Pocahontas, but Dave Zack confirmed they had them at one point. Village obviously chose a cheaper, maybe safer option. Jeff added concrete is longer lasting. Denise asked about damage to trees if concrete only. Cortney said would be little damage since no additional depth needed. Chris confirmed 5" concrete vs 3" bricks. Cortney said concrete could be no damage option. Jeff said $17K is not insignificant. Denise said Employees taking pay freezes, for instance. Jeff said we've made big changes for less money saved. Cortney said Grasscorp losing the contract is an example. Jeff said this is sensitive. He was told that Dan went door to door after our first committee meeting telling residents we were going to remove their brick sidewalks. Cortney said an outreach letter would be good to counter this. Cortney asked Chris if repair was viable. With selective root pruning could we get 5-10 years out of repair. Chris said probably yes. Cortney said we have 2 bad, 1 good option. Could we ask residents to engage with us in repair (vs replace). Jeff said a letter won't be well received. Why not door to door. Denise said why not invite them to a meeting. Cortney said he was supportive. Jeff suggested meeting outside of Council chambers. Cortney asked if we could ask a resident host a Committee Meeting. Jeff suggested having Chris play an active role since his demeanor is so calming. All agreed to include Chris. It was decided to send a simple letter to residents informing them of a meeting held on Albert Place to discuss sidewalks, knowing the sensitivity of the subject and the importance of enrolling the residents. All agreed. Jeff said the meeting will be good since we don't truly know what the residents want. We shouldn't assume. Cortney agreed to put a letter together. Jeff suggested we have it on the sidewalks out front vs at a home. All agreed.
Cortney asked if the Committee believed the best option is repair (ahead of the meeting) Denise agreed, but was concerned about "pushing off" the pain until later. Cortney said restoration is not a forever thing. A cynic would say we're kicking the can down the road, a more sensitive historically minded person would say
this repair/restoration will get us 10 years. We'll need to be careful of the words we use.
Cortney asked if the Committee was supportive of the idea of a 50/50 split. Cost is higher than it should be and as stewards and as Council we can't support paying for it all. If you can raise the remainder, we can do this project. Denise asked about possibility of a grant. Chris said yes possible but unlikely since needs to bundled with a road. Cortney said we have a bit of credibility walking into a meeting since we've reco'd repaving of their alley. Cortney asked if Committeed was supportive of cost sharing. Jeff said we have 2 assumptions: 1) not historic and 2)concrete is the standard choice. We need to weigh life expectancy vs cost. if break even, less of a concern. If 3x cost per year, we're not comfortable recoing to Council that choice. Cortney asked Chris to provide a reasonable life expectancy. Chris said 5" will last 30-40 years. Denise said without tree root issues. Cortney suggested using 10 years for repair, 30 years for concrete replacement. Cortney asked Chris to come up with an estimate for spot repair. Also cost for brick replacement and concrete. Will be good to compare. Chris confirmed $17,000 for brick includes concrete base. Cortney asked Chris to confirm 1/2 this cost for concrete alone. Cortney said repair est would be 2 sections. This allows us to come into the meeting with data. Cortney asked if we talk about historic and burden of proof. Jeff said we've done some research and experts tell us they're not historic. However we're open to other evidence. Cortney and Jeff agreed if historic we would support brick as final surface. Chris said he would estimate repair at no more than $6K; 35%-45% of area would have to be touched. Jeff said we need to accurately portray the budget situation we're in-many people don't have an understanding of the challenges. Don't scare but state we need to conscious now to avoid tax increases later.
Cortney agreed to setup a meeting with the Committee + Chris + residents on the Albert Place horseshoe.
Meeting adjorned 6:45PM.
to be continued
Cortney
----------------------------------------
Cortney called the meeting to order 6:00PM 3/19/2012 to discuss 2 topics: bids for Miami Rd resurfacing, and assessment of sidewalk repiar (Albert Pl non standard surfaces, do we assess Residents like in other Municipalities).
Cortney said Chris presented us with 6 bids. Queen City, a reputable Company, was the low bid ($121,840). Cortney thought it was reasonable and low risk. Chris estimated $130K, and bid came in $8200 below Engineer's Estimate. $60K comes in from Ohio Public Works Committee, $20K from Hamilton County Municipal Road fund (Mar 8 letter). Village pays $41,840. Cortney said previous meeting we expected to pay$40K, now $41K. Denise asked if they did work last year. Chris confirmed they did Plainville Rd. Also work in 2010 and before. Denise asked if issues. Chris said no except for a traffic complaint which was resolved in a day. Cortney recommends the Committee accept the bid of Queen City Blacktop. Jeff and Denise were aligned.
Cortney said at the last meeting, we learned that Village position is owner is responsible for sidewalks. If Public trees affect sidewalk, it's not the homeowners responsibility. Conversely, if no public property cause for damage, it's on the homeowner. Jeff said he didn't understand the inconsistency of who's responsible, sometimes homeowner, sometimes Village. Why not more consistent? Denise said our Code is same across many communities. This inconsistency is common. Cortney asked Chris about City of Cincinnati program. Chris said Urban Forestry takes care of their own trees. If trees cause damage, Urban Forestry confirms and then condemns the tree. Cortney said he's concerned about precedent of removal. Cortney asked if the Village should start assessing homeowners. Is effort worth the revenue stream? Cortney said it's an opportunity to clarify or change our position. Denise said if assess, we'll make it prohibitive for homeowners in Hist District. Already an issue with Properties being maintained. Denise suggested pay for all repairs out of same fund, no Assessments. Cortney agreed and said if 100% assessment, it's a big burden on the homeowner. Option is to assess a more reasonable fee. But still we have to manage policing sidewalks. Becomes a logistical difficulty. Jeff said assume we don't go down the assessment path, how will we react to a homeowner complaining about the first small crack. Cortney said we'd expand the road grading system to sidewalks. But do we want the overhead. Jeff asked Chris if we wanted to pursue a more aggressive program, how much would it cost? Chris said $10-$20K for a sidewalk fund. Jeff said he was concerned about overhead. Jeff asked what do we do about the Contractor who smashes the sidewalk during a homeowner project. Cortney asked if the group was supportive of maintaining the current system: Village pays for all sidewalk repair even though the Code doesn't require us to. Jeff and Denise were in alignment.
Albert Place discussion. Cortney asked if the Committee was supportive of a letter to the affected homes on Albert Place. Denise asked if the sidewalks are original. Cortney said 2 experts don't believe they are. Burden is then on the Residents to prove otherwise. Jeff asked if Albert Pl was in the historic district. Cortney said he thought it was, like Sheldon Close and Denny Place. Jeff said we need to be careful of setting precedent of replacing at any cost. This issue is not worth entering the argument at $17,000. Cortney asked what action should the Committee take. Albert Pl is in a holding pattern, no money has been appropriated. Repair is a very interesting option vs replace. Concrete base repair will be deep and will slice many roots that keep the trees healthy. So repair may be a desirable option for the residents. Could the residents repair the sidewalk areas themselves with help/instruction. We need to address the safety concern brought to us. We need to do something, just not sure what that something is. Jeff asked if there is any precedent of replacement. Cortney said Indianview had brick sidewalks. Might have been Petoskey or Pocahontas, but Dave Zack confirmed they had them at one point. Village obviously chose a cheaper, maybe safer option. Jeff added concrete is longer lasting. Denise asked about damage to trees if concrete only. Cortney said would be little damage since no additional depth needed. Chris confirmed 5" concrete vs 3" bricks. Cortney said concrete could be no damage option. Jeff said $17K is not insignificant. Denise said Employees taking pay freezes, for instance. Jeff said we've made big changes for less money saved. Cortney said Grasscorp losing the contract is an example. Jeff said this is sensitive. He was told that Dan went door to door after our first committee meeting telling residents we were going to remove their brick sidewalks. Cortney said an outreach letter would be good to counter this. Cortney asked Chris if repair was viable. With selective root pruning could we get 5-10 years out of repair. Chris said probably yes. Cortney said we have 2 bad, 1 good option. Could we ask residents to engage with us in repair (vs replace). Jeff said a letter won't be well received. Why not door to door. Denise said why not invite them to a meeting. Cortney said he was supportive. Jeff suggested meeting outside of Council chambers. Cortney asked if we could ask a resident host a Committee Meeting. Jeff suggested having Chris play an active role since his demeanor is so calming. All agreed to include Chris. It was decided to send a simple letter to residents informing them of a meeting held on Albert Place to discuss sidewalks, knowing the sensitivity of the subject and the importance of enrolling the residents. All agreed. Jeff said the meeting will be good since we don't truly know what the residents want. We shouldn't assume. Cortney agreed to put a letter together. Jeff suggested we have it on the sidewalks out front vs at a home. All agreed.
Cortney asked if the Committee believed the best option is repair (ahead of the meeting) Denise agreed, but was concerned about "pushing off" the pain until later. Cortney said restoration is not a forever thing. A cynic would say we're kicking the can down the road, a more sensitive historically minded person would say
this repair/restoration will get us 10 years. We'll need to be careful of the words we use.
Cortney asked if the Committee was supportive of the idea of a 50/50 split. Cost is higher than it should be and as stewards and as Council we can't support paying for it all. If you can raise the remainder, we can do this project. Denise asked about possibility of a grant. Chris said yes possible but unlikely since needs to bundled with a road. Cortney said we have a bit of credibility walking into a meeting since we've reco'd repaving of their alley. Cortney asked if Committeed was supportive of cost sharing. Jeff said we have 2 assumptions: 1) not historic and 2)concrete is the standard choice. We need to weigh life expectancy vs cost. if break even, less of a concern. If 3x cost per year, we're not comfortable recoing to Council that choice. Cortney asked Chris to provide a reasonable life expectancy. Chris said 5" will last 30-40 years. Denise said without tree root issues. Cortney suggested using 10 years for repair, 30 years for concrete replacement. Cortney asked Chris to come up with an estimate for spot repair. Also cost for brick replacement and concrete. Will be good to compare. Chris confirmed $17,000 for brick includes concrete base. Cortney asked Chris to confirm 1/2 this cost for concrete alone. Cortney said repair est would be 2 sections. This allows us to come into the meeting with data. Cortney asked if we talk about historic and burden of proof. Jeff said we've done some research and experts tell us they're not historic. However we're open to other evidence. Cortney and Jeff agreed if historic we would support brick as final surface. Chris said he would estimate repair at no more than $6K; 35%-45% of area would have to be touched. Jeff said we need to accurately portray the budget situation we're in-many people don't have an understanding of the challenges. Don't scare but state we need to conscious now to avoid tax increases later.
Cortney agreed to setup a meeting with the Committee + Chris + residents on the Albert Place horseshoe.
Meeting adjorned 6:45PM.
to be continued
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Finance Committee Meeting 3/6
I attended the Finance Committee Meeting (my first one) on 3/6 and here’s what I saw.
New Cruiser. This will replace an 8 year old car and limits our liability as a Village. I support purchasing a new Charger to replace the discontinued Ford Crown Victoria. In the future, I would like us to consider the Ford Taurus Interceptor as it becomes available.
Repurchase process & Stable of 6 vehicles. Right now we maintain 1 unmarked car for the Chief, one marked Tahoe for patrol and criminal investigation, 3 marked cars for patrol, and 1 unmarked retired patrol car for miscellaneous. While this number seems high on the surface, our inventory is in line with our peer departments. I would like to see us publish a program of replacement, potentially a 2 tier patrol vs non patrol program based on mileage. I would like us to consider high efficiency vehicles for non patrol and more standard vehicles for patrol. I would also like to see Total Cost of Ownership comparisons of keeping cars for 50K miles vs 75K+. If residuals are high enough as Newtown has experienced, it may make financial sense to sell cars after only 2-4 years. At the end of the day, it’s about cost of vehicle + equip + gas + repair + maintenance less resale less reusing equipment.
Ohio Consultants doing an efficiency audit. I think this is a great idea. As part-time leaders, and without a Village Administrator, we don’t know where we could be saving considerable money. I disagree wholeheartedly with the Mayor’s opinion that they can not help us. A closed-minded attitude & assuming you know all the answers is very dangerous. We will miss out on so many opportunities.
Case in point: we pay $650/month for local phone service. This number is offensively high, yet we don’t have anyone willing to chase down cost savings. Why do we pay so much? It’s because we paid that much last month, and the month before. This is likely the result of a well meaning decision a generation ago when different technology was available. What about today? For my part I will look into this painful charge.
This is but one example of autopilot "inertia" leading to waste. Where are others? Which might be executed without affecting morale, affecting employees & services? Which might be executed with minor impact on employees & services? I'm confident there are many across the Village.
Cortney
New Cruiser. This will replace an 8 year old car and limits our liability as a Village. I support purchasing a new Charger to replace the discontinued Ford Crown Victoria. In the future, I would like us to consider the Ford Taurus Interceptor as it becomes available.
Repurchase process & Stable of 6 vehicles. Right now we maintain 1 unmarked car for the Chief, one marked Tahoe for patrol and criminal investigation, 3 marked cars for patrol, and 1 unmarked retired patrol car for miscellaneous. While this number seems high on the surface, our inventory is in line with our peer departments. I would like to see us publish a program of replacement, potentially a 2 tier patrol vs non patrol program based on mileage. I would like us to consider high efficiency vehicles for non patrol and more standard vehicles for patrol. I would also like to see Total Cost of Ownership comparisons of keeping cars for 50K miles vs 75K+. If residuals are high enough as Newtown has experienced, it may make financial sense to sell cars after only 2-4 years. At the end of the day, it’s about cost of vehicle + equip + gas + repair + maintenance less resale less reusing equipment.
Ohio Consultants doing an efficiency audit. I think this is a great idea. As part-time leaders, and without a Village Administrator, we don’t know where we could be saving considerable money. I disagree wholeheartedly with the Mayor’s opinion that they can not help us. A closed-minded attitude & assuming you know all the answers is very dangerous. We will miss out on so many opportunities.
Case in point: we pay $650/month for local phone service. This number is offensively high, yet we don’t have anyone willing to chase down cost savings. Why do we pay so much? It’s because we paid that much last month, and the month before. This is likely the result of a well meaning decision a generation ago when different technology was available. What about today? For my part I will look into this painful charge.
This is but one example of autopilot "inertia" leading to waste. Where are others? Which might be executed without affecting morale, affecting employees & services? Which might be executed with minor impact on employees & services? I'm confident there are many across the Village.
Cortney
Council Meeting 2/27
I attended the Council meeting on 2/27 and here’s what I saw
Porsche Rallye. This is a great idea and shows off the Village and at the same time generates some excitement. We should do more of these type of events.
Eastern Corridor. I am worried about the effects of the proposed project on residents of Miami Bluff. Today’s view of a peaceful valley will transform into a view bisected by a busy roadway. And over time this busy roadway will morph into an Interstate 74 heading east (eventually). It will be seen, heard, and air quality will be affected. If I were living on Miami Bluff I would be concerned. I am personally unaffected by this where I live, but I don’t think we can dismiss this as ok yet. The Mayor is incorrect: the study area is in fact 1500 feet of homes (west side) on the Bluff. 1500 feet puts the far corner of the soy bean field IN THE STUDY AREA. Could this change? Sure. But as the proponents’ marketing documents exist today, we’re at approx 1500 feet away. I plan to reach out to the Residents on the Bluff and gauge their concern. If they’re ok with the plan (benefits and risks), then I’ll happily let it go and move on to other concerns. There are many.
Parking on East Center Street. While this process was executed poorly (unilateral decision making, no community involvement, painting of granite curbs, and later mean spirited & disrespectful discourse with residents), and the result is a less efficient parking “yield”, I have to trust Tim Feichtner’s expert opinion that the current configuration is best.
Public Works Streets and Sidewalks for 2012. We appropriated a number that is higher than I’m comfortable spending. But to get the bids out at a more attractive price quickly(before seasonal works begins), we recommended the higher number. This higher number doesn’t require us to spend this. My hope is 2 things happen: Hamilton County help for Miami Road portion in the amount of $20K and “hungry” contractors yielding more competitive bids vs our estimates. This will allow less money to go further.
Albert Place Brick Sidewalks. Work needs to be done to fix buckling from tree roots and general wear and aging. Since brick sidewalks are atypical and are more expensive vs poured concreted, I plan to send the residents a letter to get their opinions on how we best support them in a way that is cost effective.
School Parking. I am encouraged by smart people coming up with alternatives to a radical redo of West Street. As a parent of MM Elem children, I have questions on what additional paving will look like vs pre construction Modulars green space. I look forward to a full report.
Hugo moving in. I’m excited for this important vacancy filled and am looking fwd to trying Hugo’s new menu. We need to support them with parking close to the Square (a couple block radius). I am ready to go public with a rough, very optimistic parking plan that can yield to +/- 200 spaces vs what are being used today (not including off street opportunities). Approx ½ of these are within easy walking of Hugo (and other valued Square businesses). I have shared elements of this casually with others on Council but haven’t gotten much feedback. I’ll introduce more formally in the coming weeks.
Scott McIntosh on the Pool Board. I’m glad the Mayor resubmitted his name for consideration. Scott did a great job, and it’ll be great to have him back.
I voted in the affirmative on all votes as all were procedural in nature except: mowing – this saves the Village approx $4K yearly vs existing contract (don’t have the exact number handy as I’m typing this).
Cortney
ICRCTV.COM
Porsche Rallye. This is a great idea and shows off the Village and at the same time generates some excitement. We should do more of these type of events.
Eastern Corridor. I am worried about the effects of the proposed project on residents of Miami Bluff. Today’s view of a peaceful valley will transform into a view bisected by a busy roadway. And over time this busy roadway will morph into an Interstate 74 heading east (eventually). It will be seen, heard, and air quality will be affected. If I were living on Miami Bluff I would be concerned. I am personally unaffected by this where I live, but I don’t think we can dismiss this as ok yet. The Mayor is incorrect: the study area is in fact 1500 feet of homes (west side) on the Bluff. 1500 feet puts the far corner of the soy bean field IN THE STUDY AREA. Could this change? Sure. But as the proponents’ marketing documents exist today, we’re at approx 1500 feet away. I plan to reach out to the Residents on the Bluff and gauge their concern. If they’re ok with the plan (benefits and risks), then I’ll happily let it go and move on to other concerns. There are many.
Parking on East Center Street. While this process was executed poorly (unilateral decision making, no community involvement, painting of granite curbs, and later mean spirited & disrespectful discourse with residents), and the result is a less efficient parking “yield”, I have to trust Tim Feichtner’s expert opinion that the current configuration is best.
Public Works Streets and Sidewalks for 2012. We appropriated a number that is higher than I’m comfortable spending. But to get the bids out at a more attractive price quickly(before seasonal works begins), we recommended the higher number. This higher number doesn’t require us to spend this. My hope is 2 things happen: Hamilton County help for Miami Road portion in the amount of $20K and “hungry” contractors yielding more competitive bids vs our estimates. This will allow less money to go further.
Albert Place Brick Sidewalks. Work needs to be done to fix buckling from tree roots and general wear and aging. Since brick sidewalks are atypical and are more expensive vs poured concreted, I plan to send the residents a letter to get their opinions on how we best support them in a way that is cost effective.
School Parking. I am encouraged by smart people coming up with alternatives to a radical redo of West Street. As a parent of MM Elem children, I have questions on what additional paving will look like vs pre construction Modulars green space. I look forward to a full report.
Hugo moving in. I’m excited for this important vacancy filled and am looking fwd to trying Hugo’s new menu. We need to support them with parking close to the Square (a couple block radius). I am ready to go public with a rough, very optimistic parking plan that can yield to +/- 200 spaces vs what are being used today (not including off street opportunities). Approx ½ of these are within easy walking of Hugo (and other valued Square businesses). I have shared elements of this casually with others on Council but haven’t gotten much feedback. I’ll introduce more formally in the coming weeks.
Scott McIntosh on the Pool Board. I’m glad the Mayor resubmitted his name for consideration. Scott did a great job, and it’ll be great to have him back.
I voted in the affirmative on all votes as all were procedural in nature except: mowing – this saves the Village approx $4K yearly vs existing contract (don’t have the exact number handy as I’m typing this).
Cortney
ICRCTV.COM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
