I've fwded to Ed Mctigue, our Solicitor, for review. And I'll bring up during the Hearing.
Cortney
---------------
notice from the Village office, dated 03/12/10, of the public hearing to be held on 03/22/10 concerning the proposed zoning change requested by Mr. Spinnenweber.
I would refer you to Ohio Revised Code, section 713.12 concerning requirements for any zoning map changes:
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/713.12
Which indicates, in part:
"Before any ordinance, measure, regulation, or amendments thereto, authorized by sections 713.07
The referenced sections, 713.07 to 713.11 concern zoning. Clearly a notice published on March 12 of a meeting on March 22 is insufficient legal notice by state law.
Further, section 713.10, at:
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/713.10
indicates, in part:
"The legislative authority of such municipal corporation may amend or change the number, shape, area, or regulations of or within any [zoning] district, but no such amendment or change shall become effective unless the ordinance proposing it is first submitted to the planning commission, board, or officer for approval, disapproval, or suggestions and the commission, board, or officer is allowed a reasonable time, not less than thirty days, for consideration and report."
Again, I believe this other required minimum thirty days did not occur.
Further, I believe that since the legislative authority (i.e. council) is 'holding' the public hearing, it amounts to a council meeting (for this subject alone), requiring a quorum of council members, and that minutes be kept as an official record of the hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment