Talked with a Council Alum and he informed me of the danger of losing as well as the oppty of further growing our Industrial base. It's not an area I've thought much about, frankly. But it surely powers the Village. Search out grant money, revitalize the area, lure and keep businesses. He said focus on industrial base, as it's so much bigger contribution. I need to learn more, fast!
Cortney
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Debate a success
I'm very pleased with how the debate went last night. We had 6 of 7 Candidates participating, each answering Citizens' questions (beforehand). Questions ranged from Budget Deficit closing ideas to keeping Seniors in the Village.
I feel I had pondered each question ahead of time, and for the most part, I answered pretty clearly. And I got a lot of positive feedback after the event.
Who noticed the cheese plate?
Cortney
To view: www.icrctv.com after 10/30
I feel I had pondered each question ahead of time, and for the most part, I answered pretty clearly. And I got a lot of positive feedback after the event.
Who noticed the cheese plate?
Cortney
To view: www.icrctv.com after 10/30
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Compiled list of citizen budget ideas!!
Here's a list of all the responses I received from my July email, enlisting the help of the Citizens to close our budget gap. These ideas are often small individually, but I firmly believe a lot of small ideas add up to BIG SAVING! This is excellent - thx for taking the time to write/call. I'll fwd this list on to Bill E and Paul T as they work through their By-Department savings ideas.
Cortney
----------------------------
ACCOUNTING
-budget crunch is in the General Fund, not in the Permanent Improvement Fund. We have enough reserves to cover most expenses we might expect for Capital Items in the next few years, not including anything major such as a new Fire Truck or major (needed) improvements to the Administration building. There will be pressure on the Permanent Improvement Fund over the next 4 years or so, as we will need to spend at least $150,000 to remove and replace the Village owned Ash trees (22 of 160 village owned Ash trees this Oct). Prudent spending on other capital budget items will make this increased expenditure of $40,000 to $50,000 per year over the next 3 or 4 years possible.
INCOME
-Cars fly down Miami Road, Wooster Pike, Plainville Road, etc. It's a real safety issue. We should issue more citations, not for 3 or 4 miles over the posted speed limit, but for significant speeding. We don't want to be known as a speedtrap (that's Fairfax' job :), but let's enforce the laws on the books.
-How much money does Terrace Park raise through their pancake breakfast...or is it a dinner?...regardless, they raise money.
-renting Village space for events and gatherings? With temporary event liquor licenses, the Lagoon shelter would be rented often (not at all today)
-The cameras that monitor traffic lights and issue tickets should be installed....need less police AND get more revenue from tickets.
-Williams Meadows residents should be allowed to join pool
REDUCE COST
-combining the Maintenance Department with that of Fairfax. Our Maintenance department is essentially in the middle of Fairfax already. Presumably there could be some reduction in the number of personnel working in the combined department. There is likely much duplication between the two departments in expensive equipment, and, as some equipment is retired it would not need to be replaced.
-Consult Chief Phifer to see what reductions in the number of fire personnel are reasonable and possible. It may be that reducing the number of full time fire department employees and increasing the number of part-time fire department employees would accomplish some savings. If not, he must consider which days/shifts can tolerate a reduction in the number of people in the building on duty, and the savings from such reduction.
-Review Employee Salary Raises. Understand greater contribution on Employee health care, but we need a soln. Aso, ask employees what they prefer: layoffs, less $
-General Administration: employee hours could be reduced somewhat. Mayor needs to stop "dictating" letters.
-Maintenance currently has a new employee who is on extended probation (whom the Mayor will not let the Supervisor fire). This position should be eliminated, probably saving $50,000 per year in salary and benefits.
-Mayor + Council Members salary reduction/elimination
-The Police department has not replaced a senior officer who retired, saving approximately $80,000 per year in salary and benefits. They have also quietly eliminated one crossing guard position, and reduced the number of paid hours of the remaining four crossing guards, saving an additional estimated $10,000 per year. We should not expect more cuts in this department.
SPEND TO SAVE
-additional incentives for more businesses to come to Mariemont so that we have more tax revenue? Specifically, the key space in between the movie theater and Graeter's, as well as the spaces by The Snooty Fox.
-We really need a village administrator: Jenny Kamineris is said to save Fairfax bundles
-Village Council considered commercial development along the block across from Marielders, but decided against it because that would entail additional surface parking, which seems to make sense.
SPENDING CONTROLS
-Competitive Bids on all work
-If the mayor authorizes spending beyond what is set i.e. blacktopping a parking lot over the PW Comm.'s stated monetary outlay, he should have to reimburse the village.
-benchmarked / can we benchmark our staffing and compensation in each department against other similar towns? Typically that info is essential to organizations looking to restructure, "right size", create a strategic plan, etc.
TAXATION/FEES
-Garbage Stickers $2+
-reduce the earnings tax credit by 1/4%
-residents be charged an ark tax to go for trees, upkeep of parks, etc.
-taxing non-earnings? If a resident works a typical job for 40+ hours a week, they are taxed; if a resident lives off investment income, they are not taxed.
-increase the income tax rate. nearby communities: Cincinnati 2.1%, Fairfax 1.75%, Madeira 1% ,Silverton 1.25%, Blue Ash 1.25%, Newtown, 1%, Anderson Township 0% [townships cannot levy an income tax by law], Montgomery 1%, Indian Hill 0.4%, Norwood 2%.
WASTE
-Can Fire department take on other responsibilities during down-time....it kills me to see them hanging out killing time.
-dump the paper. It's money we don't need to spend. Mayor's Bulletins are Tweets (Twitter) or emails. Council's Meeting packets are electronic only
-Mariemont Tax Office spends over $1000 each month in rent. Negotiate a better rate or move to a new building. The Old Town Square has store fronts for $500 per month. Assume $100 for utilities (unverified), and thats $400 x 12mo = nearly $5000 savings each year! Further, lock in a 10 year lease at a low rent, taking advantage of this touch economic time.
-When it comes time to replace the police chief's car- no more inefficient expensivce SUV
-policemen and firemen cross trained for both jobs? Since firemen spend so much time waiting for emergencies, such a fires and medical emergencies, to happen, perhaps having one fewer firemen on duty for selected shifts, with one policeman for that shift cross trained as a fireman, would save on costs.
Cortney
----------------------------
ACCOUNTING
-budget crunch is in the General Fund, not in the Permanent Improvement Fund. We have enough reserves to cover most expenses we might expect for Capital Items in the next few years, not including anything major such as a new Fire Truck or major (needed) improvements to the Administration building. There will be pressure on the Permanent Improvement Fund over the next 4 years or so, as we will need to spend at least $150,000 to remove and replace the Village owned Ash trees (22 of 160 village owned Ash trees this Oct). Prudent spending on other capital budget items will make this increased expenditure of $40,000 to $50,000 per year over the next 3 or 4 years possible.
INCOME
-Cars fly down Miami Road, Wooster Pike, Plainville Road, etc. It's a real safety issue. We should issue more citations, not for 3 or 4 miles over the posted speed limit, but for significant speeding. We don't want to be known as a speedtrap (that's Fairfax' job :), but let's enforce the laws on the books.
-How much money does Terrace Park raise through their pancake breakfast...or is it a dinner?...regardless, they raise money.
-renting Village space for events and gatherings? With temporary event liquor licenses, the Lagoon shelter would be rented often (not at all today)
-The cameras that monitor traffic lights and issue tickets should be installed....need less police AND get more revenue from tickets.
-Williams Meadows residents should be allowed to join pool
REDUCE COST
-combining the Maintenance Department with that of Fairfax. Our Maintenance department is essentially in the middle of Fairfax already. Presumably there could be some reduction in the number of personnel working in the combined department. There is likely much duplication between the two departments in expensive equipment, and, as some equipment is retired it would not need to be replaced.
-Consult Chief Phifer to see what reductions in the number of fire personnel are reasonable and possible. It may be that reducing the number of full time fire department employees and increasing the number of part-time fire department employees would accomplish some savings. If not, he must consider which days/shifts can tolerate a reduction in the number of people in the building on duty, and the savings from such reduction.
-Review Employee Salary Raises. Understand greater contribution on Employee health care, but we need a soln. Aso, ask employees what they prefer: layoffs, less $
-General Administration: employee hours could be reduced somewhat. Mayor needs to stop "dictating" letters.
-Maintenance currently has a new employee who is on extended probation (whom the Mayor will not let the Supervisor fire). This position should be eliminated, probably saving $50,000 per year in salary and benefits.
-Mayor + Council Members salary reduction/elimination
-The Police department has not replaced a senior officer who retired, saving approximately $80,000 per year in salary and benefits. They have also quietly eliminated one crossing guard position, and reduced the number of paid hours of the remaining four crossing guards, saving an additional estimated $10,000 per year. We should not expect more cuts in this department.
SPEND TO SAVE
-additional incentives for more businesses to come to Mariemont so that we have more tax revenue? Specifically, the key space in between the movie theater and Graeter's, as well as the spaces by The Snooty Fox.
-We really need a village administrator: Jenny Kamineris is said to save Fairfax bundles
-Village Council considered commercial development along the block across from Marielders, but decided against it because that would entail additional surface parking, which seems to make sense.
SPENDING CONTROLS
-Competitive Bids on all work
-If the mayor authorizes spending beyond what is set i.e. blacktopping a parking lot over the PW Comm.'s stated monetary outlay, he should have to reimburse the village.
-benchmarked / can we benchmark our staffing and compensation in each department against other similar towns? Typically that info is essential to organizations looking to restructure, "right size", create a strategic plan, etc.
TAXATION/FEES
-Garbage Stickers $2+
-reduce the earnings tax credit by 1/4%
-residents be charged an ark tax to go for trees, upkeep of parks, etc.
-taxing non-earnings? If a resident works a typical job for 40+ hours a week, they are taxed; if a resident lives off investment income, they are not taxed.
-increase the income tax rate. nearby communities: Cincinnati 2.1%, Fairfax 1.75%, Madeira 1% ,Silverton 1.25%, Blue Ash 1.25%, Newtown, 1%, Anderson Township 0% [townships cannot levy an income tax by law], Montgomery 1%, Indian Hill 0.4%, Norwood 2%.
WASTE
-Can Fire department take on other responsibilities during down-time....it kills me to see them hanging out killing time.
-dump the paper. It's money we don't need to spend. Mayor's Bulletins are Tweets (Twitter) or emails. Council's Meeting packets are electronic only
-Mariemont Tax Office spends over $1000 each month in rent. Negotiate a better rate or move to a new building. The Old Town Square has store fronts for $500 per month. Assume $100 for utilities (unverified), and thats $400 x 12mo = nearly $5000 savings each year! Further, lock in a 10 year lease at a low rent, taking advantage of this touch economic time.
-When it comes time to replace the police chief's car- no more inefficient expensivce SUV
-policemen and firemen cross trained for both jobs? Since firemen spend so much time waiting for emergencies, such a fires and medical emergencies, to happen, perhaps having one fewer firemen on duty for selected shifts, with one policeman for that shift cross trained as a fireman, would save on costs.
learned about levys at Council last night
Mr. Bevis helped me & Matt Weinland understand a bit more about how the Levy process works, and Council's role in it. I assumed that a 5-1 vote in favor of the Levy is implicit support. Actually, the support is to have the public weigh in via voting. So it's not fair to say Council is supporting the levy. Thx Mr. Bevis - our quick chat was a help.
Related, I sense that nobody's for it. Mr. Bevis was very clear in his opposition, and I respect that. But the question I'm trying to wrestle with is: if a majority on council think it's a bad idea (no data here just a "feeling"), why go to the trouble of a ballot initiative? I appreciate the democracy ideal, for sure. But if it's not a "good idea", then shouldn't an alternate idea be floated? Still noodling with this one.
Cortney
Related, I sense that nobody's for it. Mr. Bevis was very clear in his opposition, and I respect that. But the question I'm trying to wrestle with is: if a majority on council think it's a bad idea (no data here just a "feeling"), why go to the trouble of a ballot initiative? I appreciate the democracy ideal, for sure. But if it's not a "good idea", then shouldn't an alternate idea be floated? Still noodling with this one.
Cortney
Thx Kiwanis for the chance to speak
I spoke this morning and enjoyed meeting the Kiwanis members. Lots of good discussion. I shared the floor with John Altman and got to know his positions better. While I did get my points across, a member pulled me aside after and gave me a couple public speaking pointers. Speaking in Public is not the same as Public Speaking :) These types of events are a great way to grow and improve. Thanks very much for the pointers. Hope to use them tonight at the Debate.
Cortney
outline of my talk same as I used at the Town Meeting Caucus, posted back in July.
Cortney
outline of my talk same as I used at the Town Meeting Caucus, posted back in July.
Debate tonight!
Pls come to the Town Crier Candidate Forum tonight (Tues 10/27) 7:00PM at Mariemont Elementary
Cortney
Cortney
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
nice converation w/ Yes on D Organizer
Had a long chat this morning and learned more about D. I'm reassured that our visions of Mariemont are very similar. Vibrant Mixed Use, expanded Business District, trolleys/trains get me excited about Mariemont's future. While we don't agree on this ballot issue, I'm excited about partnership opptys if I'm lucky enough to get elected.
Cortney
Cortney
MPF Vision Plan is needed
Attended the Planning Commission to learn more about what the MPF Vision Plan might look like. The more I learn, the more excited I get. I think it's vital to set a vision, and then work towards that vision. Here are the 5 vectors I heard about:
tax base - fuels everything
historic district - how revive, refresh. Grants?
Mixed Use - zoning to allow Historic Square bldgs to be built today
Redevelopment Areas - see my previous post of likely candidates
Land Use Lower 80 - had to leave early so missed this dicussion
I would add: Sustainability and Health/Fitness as worthy aspirations
I LOVE a proactive stance on what we want to be when we grow up. Nolen's vision is essentially incomplete. And now's a great oppty to tweak and make relevant for the next 80 years.
Cortney
tax base - fuels everything
historic district - how revive, refresh. Grants?
Mixed Use - zoning to allow Historic Square bldgs to be built today
Redevelopment Areas - see my previous post of likely candidates
Land Use Lower 80 - had to leave early so missed this dicussion
I would add: Sustainability and Health/Fitness as worthy aspirations
I LOVE a proactive stance on what we want to be when we grow up. Nolen's vision is essentially incomplete. And now's a great oppty to tweak and make relevant for the next 80 years.
Cortney
Learning on Income Tax 2 to 4 Families
Attended Planning Commission tonight and learned more about the tax burden on certain types of Rental Property. I had previously heard 2-4 family units were taxed at a higher Commercial Rate. This is incorrect. It's 4 and greater taxed at the higher rate. So a landlord makes less money if he/she owns a 4 family vs a 3 family. In fact, Village Landlords have "converted" their buildings to multiple 1 unit apartments. The other surprise: this is a STATE thing, not a Village thing. So is it an additional burden for MM Landlords? Would love a Comment to set me straight.
Cortney
Cortney
Monday, October 19, 2009
Great conversation with Citizen on Zone D
Had a chat with a retired Civil Engineer, versed in Planning. He put together some very insightful exhibits on density, parking changes in my neighborhood near Nolen Circle, as well as south of Wooster. See map to left, areas bound in thick black line:#1) Bounded by Madisonville + Murray + West
#2) South Murray + West + Grove
#3) Madisonville + West + Thorndike + Lane K
#4) Thorndike + Lane L + East
#5) West + Wooster + Bank + Miami
#6) W. Center + E. Center + Miami + Crystal Springs
If #1 #2 #3 move forward (more likely to happen w more definitive plans), here's what happens to Units & Parking:
Today approx 92 Units with 115 parking spaces will be replaced by up to 228 Units (2.5x vs today) and up to 160 above ground parking spaces (1.4x vs today), assuming equal mix of 1 and 2 br units. Not a good or bad judgment, just an "is". The personality of our District will definitely change.
A big thank you to my Civil Engineer friend who put in all the time and research.
Cortney
Town Meeting Candidates helping a Citizen Move
The Mayor called this evening, inviting me to help a gentleman move near Albert Pl tomorrow Tuesday 5;30PM. Also attending will be Andy Black, Jeff Andrews, and Joe Miller. It's an oppty to both help out and build a little exposure. A win win!
Cortney
Cortney
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Debate Details + Time Change!
Time of Debate has changed to 7:00PM Tues 10/27
Rules from Town Crier (moderator) below. Wish me luck!
Cortney
---------------
7:00 p.m. – 8:30pm: Candidate Forum
8:30 p.m. - 8:45 pm: Mingle with the candidates
It is our desire to allow voters an opportunity to meet and hear the candidates and their stands on current issues facing the community. To that end, we have developed the following procedures, based on a League of Women Voters format.
A member of the Town Crier newspaper will moderate the forum. Candidates will draw for the order of opening statements. The order will be changed for questions and closing statements.
Candidates will be seated in alphabetical order. Each candidate will have two minutes to make an opening statement, which should include his or her qualifications. We will then ask questions submitted by citizens of the community. The candidates will have one minute to respond to each question. Candidates may make a closing statement of one minute.
A timekeeper with a stopwatch and color-coded timing cards will keep candidates to the time limits. A green card means one minute left. Yellow indicates 30 seconds, and red means stop.
Following opening statements, the moderator will read the first question. Questions will be solicited from residents prior to the forum. Candidates will not have an opportunity to review the questions ahead of time. Each candidate will respond to the same question in turn. The first candidate to answer the first question will be the one seated last in the alphabetical seating plan. The candidate to the right of this person will answer the next question first. In this way, the same person will not be speaking first each time.
Questions will be gathered from citizens of Mariemont and reviewed by screeners from the Town Crier. Questions will be chosen for appropriateness and applicability to the office being sought and will be addressed to all candidates. Questions that are inappropriate for the branch of government involved in this forum will be set aside. For example, a question about school facilities would not be appropriate for Council candidates, but a question about joint use of school and Village facilities would be.
A table will be provided in the lobby for campaign literature. Candidates and their agents are prohibited from distributing materials by hand.
Rules from Town Crier (moderator) below. Wish me luck!
Cortney
---------------
7:00 p.m. – 8:30pm: Candidate Forum
8:30 p.m. - 8:45 pm: Mingle with the candidates
It is our desire to allow voters an opportunity to meet and hear the candidates and their stands on current issues facing the community. To that end, we have developed the following procedures, based on a League of Women Voters format.
A member of the Town Crier newspaper will moderate the forum. Candidates will draw for the order of opening statements. The order will be changed for questions and closing statements.
Candidates will be seated in alphabetical order. Each candidate will have two minutes to make an opening statement, which should include his or her qualifications. We will then ask questions submitted by citizens of the community. The candidates will have one minute to respond to each question. Candidates may make a closing statement of one minute.
A timekeeper with a stopwatch and color-coded timing cards will keep candidates to the time limits. A green card means one minute left. Yellow indicates 30 seconds, and red means stop.
Following opening statements, the moderator will read the first question. Questions will be solicited from residents prior to the forum. Candidates will not have an opportunity to review the questions ahead of time. Each candidate will respond to the same question in turn. The first candidate to answer the first question will be the one seated last in the alphabetical seating plan. The candidate to the right of this person will answer the next question first. In this way, the same person will not be speaking first each time.
Questions will be gathered from citizens of Mariemont and reviewed by screeners from the Town Crier. Questions will be chosen for appropriateness and applicability to the office being sought and will be addressed to all candidates. Questions that are inappropriate for the branch of government involved in this forum will be set aside. For example, a question about school facilities would not be appropriate for Council candidates, but a question about joint use of school and Village facilities would be.
A table will be provided in the lobby for campaign literature. Candidates and their agents are prohibited from distributing materials by hand.
Comments left on Yes on D Blog
Wanted to share my comments to Mark B. and the readers of the Yes on D blog:
http://mariemontmoveforward.blogspot.com/2009/10/residence-d-in-news.html?showComment=1255914562418#c211155764481374397
I don't believe one issue should get or lose a vote for me, and that's my reason for the comment. I think our issues are diverse and thorny and many, and there's no way we'll all agree always. I'd encourage a deeper review - my blog is a start.
Cortney
http://mariemontmoveforward.blogspot.com/2009/10/residence-d-in-news.html?showComment=1255914562418#c211155764481374397
I don't believe one issue should get or lose a vote for me, and that's my reason for the comment. I think our issues are diverse and thorny and many, and there's no way we'll all agree always. I'd encourage a deeper review - my blog is a start.
Cortney
Friday, October 16, 2009
Debate 10/27 7:30 Mariemont Elementary
Just found out about a Debate/Discussion a week before the election. I'm excited to share my views with more voters. See you 7:30 10/27 at Mariemont Elementary.
Cortney
Cortney
Good conversation on both sides of D
I hosted a Coffee for proponents and oponents of Residence D zoning. Frank Raeon, a D supporter, led a good, informative discussion. A total of 9 of us sat down. Not sure if anyone's mind was changed, but I learned some things. Of note:
ZONE D
-if D passes, there will be 3 phases or "gates" for a D development to pass through: ARB, Planning Committee, Council
-each of these needs to be independent to be effective
-Planning Commission and ARB are independent groups not directly affiliated with Council
-Planning Commission and ARB need to act more independently
-There are trust issues with the Nolen/Thorndike/East/West neighborhood based on how D transpired
-I believe (Cortney's opinion) that Jordan Park size/mass was an honest mistake (others in the room didn't), but we should learn from its failures and its successes. We now know what 47' x 1 block long looks like.
PLANNING/FUTURE
-Most villages (Mariemont included) react to todays needs but don't spend time setting future vision
-Mariemont will stumble in the next 10 years without a rallying vision of the future.
-Tax base is vital for economic vitality
-Mariemont suffers with no on staff planner/administrator. Grant money flows, just not here
What I really liked about the event was the honest, open, respectful sharing of ideas and beliefs. This silly national trend of screaming and yelling makes headlines but doesn't do anyone any good. A spirited debate and mutual respect is required, and we had that last night.
Cortney
ZONE D
-if D passes, there will be 3 phases or "gates" for a D development to pass through: ARB, Planning Committee, Council
-each of these needs to be independent to be effective
-Planning Commission and ARB are independent groups not directly affiliated with Council
-Planning Commission and ARB need to act more independently
-There are trust issues with the Nolen/Thorndike/East/West neighborhood based on how D transpired
-I believe (Cortney's opinion) that Jordan Park size/mass was an honest mistake (others in the room didn't), but we should learn from its failures and its successes. We now know what 47' x 1 block long looks like.
PLANNING/FUTURE
-Most villages (Mariemont included) react to todays needs but don't spend time setting future vision
-Mariemont will stumble in the next 10 years without a rallying vision of the future.
-Tax base is vital for economic vitality
-Mariemont suffers with no on staff planner/administrator. Grant money flows, just not here
What I really liked about the event was the honest, open, respectful sharing of ideas and beliefs. This silly national trend of screaming and yelling makes headlines but doesn't do anyone any good. A spirited debate and mutual respect is required, and we had that last night.
Cortney
conversation with local realtor
Here's a transcript of an email I sent this evening.
Cortney
--------------------------------------
Didn't see your note until just now - sorry I'm just getting back to you. We had a good event with neighbors on Thorndike, East, West, and Nolen. Frank Raeon led a good discussion. You would absolutely have been welcome to join.
Here's my D position:
NEED
zoning is overdue - what was put in place in the 50's was bad for the Village. We need condo development, mixed use development. We need to increase our tax base. Non historic buildings that have been let fall apart should be replaced (although shame on Council for letting this happen). The unfair tax code on 2-4 families should be reviewed.
LEGISLATION
D's creation was amateurish. No standards, no science, no reapplying what works in other historic towns. D was created for, and I would argue BY Rick Griewe. It was rubber stamped through all the meetings, and the Thorndike/Nolen/East/West neigbhorhood's concerns raised again and again were ignored. Height is too tall, surface parking is a concern, setbacks are a concern, etc.
FUTURE
I'm confident D will be approved on 11/3, and I will respect the Voters' decision and support appropriate D projects. Rick's designs are attractive and of quality, and I will work with him to find common ground. Further, I'd like to see a Residence E that allows Multi use. If I can get traction, I'll try to introduce it.
Cortney
-----------------------
I read your blog and have been very much in step with your positions on majority of topics. That being said, reading your blog this morning I realized I misunderstood your position on "D". "D" to me is as important issue to Mariemont as the recent discussion of the changes to the schools. I want to understand your position better.
Cortney
--------------------------------------
Didn't see your note until just now - sorry I'm just getting back to you. We had a good event with neighbors on Thorndike, East, West, and Nolen. Frank Raeon led a good discussion. You would absolutely have been welcome to join.
Here's my D position:
NEED
zoning is overdue - what was put in place in the 50's was bad for the Village. We need condo development, mixed use development. We need to increase our tax base. Non historic buildings that have been let fall apart should be replaced (although shame on Council for letting this happen). The unfair tax code on 2-4 families should be reviewed.
LEGISLATION
D's creation was amateurish. No standards, no science, no reapplying what works in other historic towns. D was created for, and I would argue BY Rick Griewe. It was rubber stamped through all the meetings, and the Thorndike/Nolen/East/West neigbhorhood's concerns raised again and again were ignored. Height is too tall, surface parking is a concern, setbacks are a concern, etc.
FUTURE
I'm confident D will be approved on 11/3, and I will respect the Voters' decision and support appropriate D projects. Rick's designs are attractive and of quality, and I will work with him to find common ground. Further, I'd like to see a Residence E that allows Multi use. If I can get traction, I'll try to introduce it.
Cortney
-----------------------
I read your blog and have been very much in step with your positions on majority of topics. That being said, reading your blog this morning I realized I misunderstood your position on "D". "D" to me is as important issue to Mariemont as the recent discussion of the changes to the schools. I want to understand your position better.
Zone D opposition now in print
Saw a sneak peak of next week's Eastern Hills Journal. I think I was fairly quoted:
http://communitypress.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/C2/20091015/NEWS/910150331/
I think Lisa Wakeland does a nice job for the Village.
One addition to my position: I'm all about hearing the Citizen. If D passes (and I think it will), I will respect the Voters' choice and will support sensitive D projects in the Village.
Cortney
http://communitypress.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/C2/20091015/NEWS/910150331/
I think Lisa Wakeland does a nice job for the Village.
One addition to my position: I'm all about hearing the Citizen. If D passes (and I think it will), I will respect the Voters' choice and will support sensitive D projects in the Village.
Cortney
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Phil Buress voter guide
I received an election/voter guide from Phil Buress, of the very conservative Citizens for Community Values group. It's essentially a "you're with us or you're against us" questionaire. I'm not sure what to do with it. On one hand, I could fill it out and risk being smeared later (some of my views are not aligned with CCV), or I could choose not to and stifle conversation.
Struggling with this, but am leaning towards filling it in.
Cortney
Struggling with this, but am leaning towards filling it in.
Cortney
conversation with Joe Miller
Had a nice conversation with Joe Miller last evening. I reached out to him a couple months back, and he apologized for not calling sooner. Both he and I have crazy jobs right now.
He said he is suggesting to others Miller, Andrews, Black, Scheeser. And I'm flattered to have his support.
His marketing will be in full swing this week. Good luck this November, Joe!
Cortney
He said he is suggesting to others Miller, Andrews, Black, Scheeser. And I'm flattered to have his support.
His marketing will be in full swing this week. Good luck this November, Joe!
Cortney
copy of flyer
Here's the flyer I've handed out to over 200 homes around the Village. The Mayor gave me feedback, saying it was too detailed, and it has and will cost me votes. I guess I'd rather you know what I believe and not vote for me than to be wishy-washy. Please vote for me, unless you and I aren't a good match.
I'm making more and will change it slightly - more of a CHEESE theme. But I hope the content remains true.
Cortney
--------------------------------
My name is Cortney Scheeser, and I’m running for Mariemont Village Council. I would like to share a little about me, my qualifications and my priorities if elected, and hopefully earn your vote.
I’m married to Amy, and we have 3 daughters, all at Mariemont Elementary. We live on Nolen Circle, and I represent District 4 as the Town Meeting Candidate. I’m very proud to have won the support of my neighbors at the Caucus Vote. By day, I’ve worked for P&G for 14 years where I’m an Analyst.
I feel I’m a good choice for Council for a number of reasons. 1) My 14 years of Business experience can help the Village operate more efficiently. For instance, P&G forces us each year to do more with less, yet we always find a way. 2) Fresh Perspective. The Village is experiencing financial trouble – fresh ideas are needed! Healthy tension of differing viewpoints seems to be missing and can hone and improve ideas. 3) Plugged in to what’s going on, thanks to my kids. 4) I am passionate about Mariemont and will work tirelessly for its Citizens.
I’m focusing on three big issues this Fall:
Budget Deficit: We must 1) Enroll Citizens to help make the right, tough choices. 2) As Village Employee Salaries and Benefits account for over 80% of the General Fund, we should review $1000 Council Salaries and the 2% Village Employee raises, considering inflation will be at or below 0%. 3) I will support passing Rumpke's recent rate hike to Citizens via the Garbage Sticker program, paired with Recycling/Composting education.
Government Communication: We must 1)open up as many lines of communication as possible as well as 2)conduct all business in public. We should reach people via ways they already communicate like social networking (Twitter, Nixle), improved email, texting, blogs, improved website, etc., along with more traditional methods of communication. We need additional avenues to `hear' the Citizen. Online surveys are a great example. Finally, all meetings should be set well in advance, be welcoming to all, be recorded, and of course be public. I’m trying to model this behavior with my Blog.
Zoning: I believe strongly that updating our Zoning, encouraging Condo and Mixed Use development, is needed and overdue. However, the current 45’ height maximum is out of balance with the 1-1/2 storey bungalows and cape cods in the neighborhood. I'm willing to concede increased surface parking, increased density, and reduced property setbacks, but I can't support the height. My analysis suggests 3 storeys (Developer requirement) can be worked into 37'; I would support a generous 40’ maximum. I love the idea of updating Zoning, but it has to be sensitive to the neighborhood.
Thanks so much for taking the time to read this. More information on me and my positions is available at Scheeser.blogspot.com Pls call, email, blog with any questions you may have.
Cortney Scheeser
271-4513
cscheeser@yahoo.com
www.Scheeser.blogspot.com
6958 Nolen CirPaid for by Scheeser for Council, 6950 Nolen Circle Mariemont Ohio 45227, Cortney Scheeser Treasurer
I'm making more and will change it slightly - more of a CHEESE theme. But I hope the content remains true.
Cortney
--------------------------------
My name is Cortney Scheeser, and I’m running for Mariemont Village Council. I would like to share a little about me, my qualifications and my priorities if elected, and hopefully earn your vote.
I’m married to Amy, and we have 3 daughters, all at Mariemont Elementary. We live on Nolen Circle, and I represent District 4 as the Town Meeting Candidate. I’m very proud to have won the support of my neighbors at the Caucus Vote. By day, I’ve worked for P&G for 14 years where I’m an Analyst.
I feel I’m a good choice for Council for a number of reasons. 1) My 14 years of Business experience can help the Village operate more efficiently. For instance, P&G forces us each year to do more with less, yet we always find a way. 2) Fresh Perspective. The Village is experiencing financial trouble – fresh ideas are needed! Healthy tension of differing viewpoints seems to be missing and can hone and improve ideas. 3) Plugged in to what’s going on, thanks to my kids. 4) I am passionate about Mariemont and will work tirelessly for its Citizens.
I’m focusing on three big issues this Fall:
Budget Deficit: We must 1) Enroll Citizens to help make the right, tough choices. 2) As Village Employee Salaries and Benefits account for over 80% of the General Fund, we should review $1000 Council Salaries and the 2% Village Employee raises, considering inflation will be at or below 0%. 3) I will support passing Rumpke's recent rate hike to Citizens via the Garbage Sticker program, paired with Recycling/Composting education.
Government Communication: We must 1)open up as many lines of communication as possible as well as 2)conduct all business in public. We should reach people via ways they already communicate like social networking (Twitter, Nixle), improved email, texting, blogs, improved website, etc., along with more traditional methods of communication. We need additional avenues to `hear' the Citizen. Online surveys are a great example. Finally, all meetings should be set well in advance, be welcoming to all, be recorded, and of course be public. I’m trying to model this behavior with my Blog.
Zoning: I believe strongly that updating our Zoning, encouraging Condo and Mixed Use development, is needed and overdue. However, the current 45’ height maximum is out of balance with the 1-1/2 storey bungalows and cape cods in the neighborhood. I'm willing to concede increased surface parking, increased density, and reduced property setbacks, but I can't support the height. My analysis suggests 3 storeys (Developer requirement) can be worked into 37'; I would support a generous 40’ maximum. I love the idea of updating Zoning, but it has to be sensitive to the neighborhood.
Thanks so much for taking the time to read this. More information on me and my positions is available at Scheeser.blogspot.com Pls call, email, blog with any questions you may have.
Cortney Scheeser
271-4513
cscheeser@yahoo.com
www.Scheeser.blogspot.com
6958 Nolen CirPaid for by Scheeser for Council, 6950 Nolen Circle Mariemont Ohio 45227, Cortney Scheeser Treasurer
Monday, October 12, 2009
Do the signs look gouda?
.jpg)
I'm excited to see my signs dotting the Village. I had 50 made. Handing them out went pretty fast. Heres's an image:
I'm pleased with how they turned out - instant recall opportunity at the polls. I spent my childhood running from le frommage, now I'm embracing it. Can't spell 'Scheeser' without Cheese.
They're all out there now. Thanks to the Mayor, Ted Copetas, and Geoff Kaye for helping place many of them. Hope they'll be a help.
Cortney
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Public TV Spots
The final TV spots are in. Here are links to all who made videos:
http://icrctv.com/mariemont-village-council
How do I stack up?
Cortney
http://icrctv.com/mariemont-village-council
How do I stack up?
Cortney
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
signs ordered!!
I've decided to get signs. I'll have them in hand on Friday and will distribute 50 of them this weekend.
They're unique, and will really help with Instant Recall at the Polls. You'll see them unveiled on Saturday.
Cortney
They're unique, and will really help with Instant Recall at the Polls. You'll see them unveiled on Saturday.
Cortney
Good Conversation with Mayor
I got a call from the Mayor today and we had a good chat. I learned a bunch of things.
-the Mayor is supporting me as one of his 4 picks, in addition to Black, Miller, and Andrews
-he's influenced 200 voters to vote for me to date
-I need 600 votes to win a seat
-I'm a distant 4th in popularity
-I'm alienating some voters because of my strong stances on Budget and Zoning
His reco
-signs will help
-position generalities will help
My takeaways
-way to go Jeff! You're making great inroads everywhere.
-I'm proud to have the Mayor's support. He helps with a demographic I'll have trouble reaching.
-I think strong positions are bold and necessary
-If I lose because of them, I'm not the right guy for the job and I'm ok with it
Thanks Mayor for the time and the feedback. Very helpful.
Cortney
-the Mayor is supporting me as one of his 4 picks, in addition to Black, Miller, and Andrews
-he's influenced 200 voters to vote for me to date
-I need 600 votes to win a seat
-I'm a distant 4th in popularity
-I'm alienating some voters because of my strong stances on Budget and Zoning
His reco
-signs will help
-position generalities will help
My takeaways
-way to go Jeff! You're making great inroads everywhere.
-I'm proud to have the Mayor's support. He helps with a demographic I'll have trouble reaching.
-I think strong positions are bold and necessary
-If I lose because of them, I'm not the right guy for the job and I'm ok with it
Thanks Mayor for the time and the feedback. Very helpful.
Cortney
Hosting Coffee for Res D Zoning
I've decided to host a Coffee to dicuss Residence D. One of the 'Yes on D' organizers approached me last week to host an event. On one hand, I think we've talked a lot and most folks have made their decision. But, in the spirit of open, honest discourse and transparent communication, I think it's a great opportunity. So I'm in!
The event is Thurs 10/15 8:00PM. If you'd like to attend, pls let me know!
Cortney
email text
-----------------
The purpose of my email is to ask if you or one of your neighbors on Nolen Circle or Thorndike would be interested in holding a coffee meeting to discuss Residence D? FYI, I'm thinking sometime prior to October 15th.
I've participated in one such meeting to date - a meeting where 7 other people attended in order to learn more about Residence D and to discuss what its pros and cons might be. While I know you have gone on record as opposing Residence D I would welcome the opportunity to continue our dialog.
Generally speaking, a "crowd" of 8-10 people is as big a group as I would like to see gather for an hour or so. We can hold the meeting at someone's house or maybe outdoors either in someone's front or back yard. Having water, pop, and coffee available for guests is recommended but not essential. Having some food for nibbling is ok but is also not necessary.
Cortney, please advise me about your willingness to host a coffee or, if you decline, give me the names and email addresses of one or two other potential hosts. I will subsequently email them. In addition, I would be happy to call them.
The event is Thurs 10/15 8:00PM. If you'd like to attend, pls let me know!
Cortney
email text
-----------------
The purpose of my email is to ask if you or one of your neighbors on Nolen Circle or Thorndike would be interested in holding a coffee meeting to discuss Residence D? FYI, I'm thinking sometime prior to October 15th.
I've participated in one such meeting to date - a meeting where 7 other people attended in order to learn more about Residence D and to discuss what its pros and cons might be. While I know you have gone on record as opposing Residence D I would welcome the opportunity to continue our dialog.
Generally speaking, a "crowd" of 8-10 people is as big a group as I would like to see gather for an hour or so. We can hold the meeting at someone's house or maybe outdoors either in someone's front or back yard. Having water, pop, and coffee available for guests is recommended but not essential. Having some food for nibbling is ok but is also not necessary.
Cortney, please advise me about your willingness to host a coffee or, if you decline, give me the names and email addresses of one or two other potential hosts. I will subsequently email them. In addition, I would be happy to call them.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
John Nolen quote 1926
What City Planning is:
An aide to the man in the street to visualize his city properly planned;
A practical, sensible way of providing a place for everything with everything in its place;
An instrument for uniting citizens to work for the city’s future; and
An efficient means of avoiding duplication and waste in public improvements.
- John Nolen, Comprehensive Plan for
From article on present day planning
http://samlanddisney.blogspot.com/2009/10/design-disneyland-toontown-urban.html
I think we need to continue to “plan” every day as a Village. It’s not over! And MPF’s future vision doc will help set the end goal to plan “towards”.
Cortney
Monday, October 5, 2009
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Fliers Done! (for now)
I handed out all 140 campaign fliers, and I'm all caught up. I'll try to deliver 2x per week going forward, hopefully in time to affect Absentee Ballot decisions.
Amy's lobbying me to get signs. I will check prices tomorrow. I'm not sure it's needed to win in Nov, but it can't hurt....
Also, found out that Mayor P. is campaigning on my behalf as a Town Meeting Candidate. Also on his list: Joe, Andy and Jeff Andrews. I'll gladly take the publicity, especially focused on the senior demographic, in which the Mayor has a great relationship.
Cortney
Amy's lobbying me to get signs. I will check prices tomorrow. I'm not sure it's needed to win in Nov, but it can't hurt....
Also, found out that Mayor P. is campaigning on my behalf as a Town Meeting Candidate. Also on his list: Joe, Andy and Jeff Andrews. I'll gladly take the publicity, especially focused on the senior demographic, in which the Mayor has a great relationship.
Cortney
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Distributing Fliers
I've made 140 letters for the households requesting Absentee Ballots. I've delivered >10% so far. Many to go! Will hopefully be complete tomorrow.
Cortney
Cortney
Thursday, October 1, 2009
What to do with Dale Park School
From a Citizen:
Some ideas about the future of Dale Park.As you may know, the School District owns the building plus one foot of surrounding land on all sides. The Village owns the rest.Therefore any future use of the building must involve the Village...Since the current Village Administration building is not adequate in size to accommodate all the Village offices adequately (e.g.,the Tax Office is in the Mariemont Executive Building [expensive rent]), why not move some Village offices to Dale Park. This could include essentially everything except the Police & Fire Departments, with some remodeling of the current administration building to suit their needs (e.g., better sleeping quarters for the firemen, upstairs). Further, the current Village Admin building is not handicap accessible, and parts of Dale Park are (e.g.: the cafeteria level, I believe).Other parts of the building might be used for larger space for Mariemont Preservation Foundation, with expanded space for displays and perhaps a museum, including some American Indian artifacts from the area.Still other parts might be used for expanded space for the MariElders, again, with larger handicap accessible meeting space.Perhaps the School district offices might also remain there, to save $ instead of building such space into new school buildings.
-------------------------------------
I've also heard about making Dale Park a Rec Center. There are lots of great ideas out there.
Cortney
Some ideas about the future of Dale Park.As you may know, the School District owns the building plus one foot of surrounding land on all sides. The Village owns the rest.Therefore any future use of the building must involve the Village...Since the current Village Administration building is not adequate in size to accommodate all the Village offices adequately (e.g.,the Tax Office is in the Mariemont Executive Building [expensive rent]), why not move some Village offices to Dale Park. This could include essentially everything except the Police & Fire Departments, with some remodeling of the current administration building to suit their needs (e.g., better sleeping quarters for the firemen, upstairs). Further, the current Village Admin building is not handicap accessible, and parts of Dale Park are (e.g.: the cafeteria level, I believe).Other parts of the building might be used for larger space for Mariemont Preservation Foundation, with expanded space for displays and perhaps a museum, including some American Indian artifacts from the area.Still other parts might be used for expanded space for the MariElders, again, with larger handicap accessible meeting space.Perhaps the School district offices might also remain there, to save $ instead of building such space into new school buildings.
-------------------------------------
I've also heard about making Dale Park a Rec Center. There are lots of great ideas out there.
Cortney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
